https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/20/politics/facts-first-colorado-supreme-court-justices-unelected/index.html
Search Results (199) for: justices
The Dispatch→ Common Law Judgments, Common Sense Justices
The court’s skepticism of financial regulators’ power may be the prelude to an even bigger case.
Lead Stories→ Fact Check: Chief Justice John Roberts Did NOT Request $780 Million For Security Of Supreme Court Justices
Did Chief Justice John Roberts ask for $780 million to protect the nine U.S. Supreme Court justices, with each of the justices receiving close to $87 million, in 2024? No, that's not true: The federal judiciary system asked Congress in Ma
Logically→ The image shows Supreme Court Justices Surya Kant and JB Pardiwala having lunch with Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy.
Tamil Nadu Finance Minister P Thiagarajan and Ram Narasimhan have been misidentified as Supreme Court Justices Surya Kant and JB Pardiwala.
Snopes→ Justices Dismiss Trump-Era Immigration Case, in a Biden Win
The Supreme Court said it was wrong to wade into a dispute involving a Trump-era immigration rule that the Biden administration has abandoned, so the justices dismissed the case.
PolitiFact→ Is it legal to protest outside justices’ homes? The law suggests no
Whether recent abortion protests are considered illegal would be up to a court’s interpretation, constitutional law experts say.
Snopes→ Roe Leak: No, Justices Didn’t Argue Against Abortion to Boost ‘Domestic Supply of Infants’
Abortion-rights activists responded with outrage to a footnote from the draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade. What it actually said was very different.
Snopes→ Were Most Conservative Supreme Court Justices Appointed by Presidents Who Lost Popular Vote?
And were they confirmed by Senators who represented a minority of Americans?
Snopes→ Did Conservative Justices Lie About Roe v. Wade?
Left-wing critics caused "#LyingGOP" to trend on social media in May 2022. But did they miss something important?
PolitiFact→ Don Beyer – Yes, the Trump justices said Roe v. Wade was a precedent in confirmation hearings
“... Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett assured the Senate Judiciary Committee and the American people that Roe v. Wade was ‘established precedent.’”
Snopes→ Justices to Hear Challenge to Race in College Admissions
The court said it will take up lawsuits claiming that Harvard University, a private institution, and the University of North Carolina, a state school, discriminate against Asian American applicants.
AllSides→ FactChecking the Justices’ COVID-19 Claims
https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/factchecking-the-justices-covid-19-claims/ The U.S. Supreme Court hea
FactCheck.org→ FactChecking the Justices’ COVID-19 Claims
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Jan. 7 in two challenges to the Biden administration’s attempts to expand the use of vaccinations. Here we present the facts on some of the COVID-19 claims made by the justices. Children Hospitalized with C
PolitiFact→ Bloggers – No, John Roberts didn’t criticize Supreme Court justices’ ‘inappropriate political influence’
“Chief Justice John Roberts goes after the highest court in the land, citing their ‘inappropriate political influence.’”
Snopes→ Justices Turn Away Florist Who Refused Same-Sex Wedding Job
Four justices are needed for the court to take a case.
Snopes→ Justices Rule for Cursing Cheerleader over Snapchat Post
The Supreme Court ruled that a Pennsylvania public school wrongly suspended a cheerleader over a vulgar social media post.
Snopes→ Justices Reject Johnson & Johnson Appeal of $2B Talc Verdict
The Supreme Court is leaving in place a $2 billion verdict in favor of women who claim they developed ovarian cancer from using Johnson & Johnson talc products.
Snopes→ Justices Consider Hearing a Case on ‘Most Offensive Word’
The case is a test of whether the justices are willing to wade into the ongoing, complex conversations about race happening nationwide.
Snopes→ Justices Rule Muslim Men Can Sue FBI Agents over No-Fly List
A unanimous Supreme Court ruled that Muslim men who were placed on the government’s no-fly list because they refused to serve as FBI informants can seek to hold federal agents financially liable.
Snopes→ Justices Deny Fast, New Look at Pennsylvania Ballot Deadline
The Supreme Court said it would not grant a quick, pre-election review to a new Republican appeal to exclude absentee ballots received after Election Day in the presidential battleground state of Pennsylvania.
Truth or Fiction?→ Did Trump Say Amy Coney Barrett is ‘Much Better Looking’ Than Other Supreme Court Justices?
As the United States Senate proceeded with the Supreme Court confirmation process for Judge Amy Coney Barrett on October 13 2020, a fabricated quote recirculated on Facebook repackaged as a graphic. Within hours of being posted, the meme had amassed m
Snopes→ Justices Say Women Can Get Abortion Pill by Mail, for Now
The Supreme Court said it would for now continue to allow women to obtain an abortion pill by mail during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Snopes→ California Justices Toss Death Penalty for Scott Peterson
The justices cited "significant errors" in jury selection in overturning the death penalty but welcomed prosecutors to again seek the sentence if they wish.
Snopes→ Justices Rule States Can Bind Presidential Electors’ Votes
The ruling, just under four months before the 2020 election, leaves in place laws in 32 states and the District of Columbia that bind electors to vote for the popular-vote winner.
Snopes→ Justices Keep Hold on Secret Russia Investigation Material
The Supreme Court is denying Congress access to secret grand jury testimony from special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation.
Snopes→ Justices Rule for Trump Administration in Deportation Case
A 7-2 ruling allows for the expedited removal of people who are picked up at or near the border and fail their initial asylum screenings.
Snopes→ Justices Uphold Protections for Young Immigrants
The justices rejected administration arguments that the 8-year-old Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program is illegal and that courts have no role to play in reviewing the decision to end DACA.
Snopes→ Justices Rule LGBT People Protected From Job Discrimination
The court decided by a 6-3 vote that a key provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 known as Title VII that bars job discrimination because of sex, among other reasons, encompasses bias against LGBT workers.
Snopes→ In Hawaii Case, Justices See Broad Reach of Clean Water Act
Rejecting the Trump administration’s views, the justices held that the discharge of polluted water into the ground, rather than directly into waterways, does not relieve an industry of complying with the Clean Water Act.
Snopes→ Justices to Take Up Dispute over Subpoenas for Trump Records
The Supreme Court said it will hear President Donald Trump's pleas to keep his tax, bank and financial records private, a major confrontation between the president and Congress that also could affect the 2020 presidential campaign.
Snopes→ Justices Reject Call for New Trial in ‘Serial’ Podcast Case
The Supreme Court rejected a Maryland man’s bid for a new trial based on information uncovered by the hit podcast “Serial.”
Snopes→ California Justices Reject Law Requiring Trump Tax Returns
President Donald Trump does not have to disclose his tax returns to appear as a candidate on California’s primary ballot next spring, a unanimous state Supreme Court ruled.
Washington Post→ Susan Collins’s wrong claim on Planned Parenthood and Supreme Court justices
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said the abortion-rights group automatically opposed O'Connor, Kennedy and Souter, but that's incorrect -- and she admits her error.
Snopes→ Justices Side with Colorado Baker on Same-Sex Wedding Cake
The justices' limited ruling turned on what the court described as anti-religious bias on the Colorado Civil Rights Commission when it ruled against baker Jack Phillips.
Snopes→ Justices Take up Dispute over Wedding Cake for Gay Couple
The Supreme Court is taking up the highly anticipated case of the Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.
FactCheck.org→ Justices Didn’t Oppose Gorsuch
Q: Did all eight Supreme Court justices write a letter opposing Judge Neil Gorsuch’s nomination to fill a court vacancy? A: No. That false claim was made on a liberal website that misrepresented a court ruling regarding the Individuals with Disa
Snopes→ All 8 Supreme Court Justices Stand in Solidarity Against Trump SCOTUS Pick?
Supreme Court justices didn't pen a "letter" saying President Trump was "completely wrong in choosing Neil Gorsuch" to fill a vacant seat on the court.
FactCheck.org→ FactChecking Trump’s ‘Fact Check’ of the State of the Union
Para leer en español, vea esta traducción de Google Translate. Former President Donald Trump promised to provide a live “play by play” via Truth Social to “correct, in rapid response, any and all inaccurate Statements” mad
FactCheck.org→ Role of Illinois Circuit Court Judge Misrepresented in Post About Trump’s Removal from Ballot
Para leer en español, vea esta traducción de Google Translate. Quick Take The Supreme Court ruled that states may not remove former President Donald Trump from primary ballots based on the Constitution’s insurrection clause. A few days b
Lead Stories→ Fact Check: U.S. JAG Did NOT Arrest 3rd Colorado Supreme Court Justice
Did the U.S. Judge Advocate General's Corps arrest a "third" Colorado Supreme Court justice who voted in favor of removing former President Donald Trump from the ballot in the state for the 2024 presidential election? No, that's not true: